Hit Counter

Friday, February 18, 2011

Changes

At some point between the ending of last year and the beginning of this one, my year group went through the traumatic stages of moving on from being an immature, emotionally inarticulate bunch of Year 10 rabble to reaching the dizzying heights of Year 11-hood, Senior School, and all that entails.

That’s the theory, anyway.

In practice I haven’t noticed that much difference between us as Year 10s and us, two months later, as Year 11. There have been changes, certainly. But a great deal has stayed the same.

So, I thought for my first official post of the school year I’d discuss the theme of CHANGE. I was hoping to play David Bowie’s ‘Changes’ over the top to really prove my point, but unfortunately one of the things that hasn’t changed is my inability to work any kind of technology with any degree of competency. I’m fine with that, though, because I hate the song.

Anyway, this post is going to cover this exciting new stage in our lives. Which things are different, what hasn’t changed, all neatly set out under a series of headings. It’s the start of the year, after all. I’m one of those people who begins the year incredibly organised, books all in the right places, sheets tidily glued into the relevant books, small plastic turtle blu-tacked to the door of my locker (for those of you that I haven’t shown it to, yes, I have a turtle attached to my locker door. I think it’s trendy). Then, after about a month, things start to go downhill. I’ve a feeling it will be the same with this blog. Right now I’m feeling capable of knocking out about two regular posts a month, complete with pictures, headings, interesting Chaser clips you’ve probably seen but I’ve decided to show you again. And yet by this time next month I’ll struggling to get out so much as a couple hundred words with maybe a couple of unrelated graphics. It’s because of difficulties like this that I have established my groundbreaking timesaving BFTP project. More on that next time, however. For now, CHANGE, its effects and its repercussions.



UNIFORMS

One significant benefit of being a senior is that we get a new uniform. It’s not that much better, to be honest. We get white shirts and red skirts (but the boys wear grey shorts, not skirts. I’m glad I remembered to add this parenthesis in time, I was just re-reading the post quickly before clicking ‘Publish’. That could have been awkward). I actually quite liked the old, blue uniform – although the shirts are more comfortable, and it’s nice not having to wear the odd sack-like dresses any more. The important thing about this uniform is that it can be used to inspire RESPECT. Theoretically. Again, different in practice. The only real difference is that now we all feel more important. I thought it had worked on a group of Year 9s yesterday – they were definitely looking more respectful than when they were Year 8s and I was a Year 10 – but then I kind of screwed that up by walking into a pole. Less embarrassing than my whole injuring-the-backs-of-my-hands-after-chasing-Gwen-humming-the-theme-song-to-‘Whose-Line-Is-It-Anyway’ (an incident slightly less traumatic than the title is long), but still not pleasant. Also I now have a bruise on my forehead.



SUBJECTS

Ah, the joys of doing subjects you like instead of struggling away doing Geography, Physics, or PE. The pleasures of discovering that you have a double English that day, and no sciences, and then remembering that you’re not actually studying any sciences. The mind-blowing awesomeness of looking at your timetable and going ‘Yep, it’s a good day, no bad subjects’ – and then remembering that you ONLY study good subjects now and every day is a good day. Except days when you have assessment due. And man, are there a lot of those.

As an English double major, I’m currently studying Shakespeare, Ninteenth Century Literature, French, Hospitality, Specialist A Maths, and War in the Modern World (my History unit – it’s just on my timetable as ‘War’. My friends have long ago gotten tired of me saying ‘What have I got next? Oh, I’m going to war’).

Incidentally, bear with me over the following passages. Many of the paragraphs mention things that will only make sense to people in my classes. Otherwise just find me at school, and I’ll explain it to you.

My Shakespeare class – which Ariane and Marie-Clare are both in - is currently reading a play called ‘Dead White Males’, all about conflicting ideologies and Shakespeare’s relevance in contemporary society. It’s become pointless to attempt to persuade an outraged Ariane that the characters aren’t real people, and no matter how long you spend loudly criticising their actions, it’s unlikely to change anything. It’s especially pointless when you consider that every single other person in the class is doing exactly the same thing. I mean, what the hell were you thinking, Angela? Grant Swain is using you. USING YOU. He’s twisting you to be like him. Swain is a symbol of the repressive patriarchal ideological system he claims to be so set on overthrowing. Run away with Steve, leave Melissa and Swain to their own devices, and live happily ever after. I’ve had my say now.

Giuseppe, Lala, Kapish, and Hitler are all in my Ninteenth Century Literature class. We’re doing Ibsen. Yes. The other class get to do Oscar Wilde and we’re sudying Henrik Ibsen, that most famous of Norwegian playwrights.

It’s not that bad, honestly, it’s just that I really like Oscar Wilde. Still, I’ve shotgunned Dorian Gray for my oral (in the sense of having chosen him rather than of having sent him to a bloody and violent death). If you’re reading this, fellow-Oscar-Wilde-fan-in-my-class – and you probably don’t know who you are, from that description – it’s too late. Do The Importance of Being Earnest. Or the Ballad of Reading Gaol. Either that, or you’ll be cursed forever with the heinous crime of having broken the rule of shotgun. The choice is yours.

French, too, is good. I’ve actually got a French exchange student living with me at the moment. I won’t write any more about her as (a) it might technically be a breach of privacy, (b) most of you will meet her on Monday anyway and (c) I don’t know the French for ‘What blog nickname do you want?’.

Hosipitality, as is true for any subject in which the majority of assessment is down to you cooking things in class and then eating them, is FULLY AWESOME. Ness is in my class. We made cheese-and-bacon muffins. It was fun. That is to say, I burnt myself three times (once on a piece of bacon and twice on the hot water tap, which, considering I’m a Senior, I should have learnt how to use by now), dripped oil all over the bench, and then found a piece of bacon behind my ear. Still no idea why it was there (I don’t remember touching my ear . . .) or how it managed not to fall off. I suppose it will always remain a mystery. Anyway, the muffins were fantastic.

The only less good thing about food is that we’re supposed to wear proper button-up white jackets, checked trousers, and flat chef’s hats while cooking, which, while being impractical, makes us all look like prats. We even have to wear a checked necktie while out in public. Oh, yes. Because the addition of the necktie will make us so much less ridiculous.

I’m not even going to begin to talk about Maths. Chinny and Gwen are terrific. Peanut and I sit together and try to figure out how we’ve managed to get different answers using the same working (sadly, this happens a lot. Even more sadly, she’s usually right).

And, finally, War. I have Mr W as a teacher.

Earlier this week, a fly was trapped in our classroom. For some reason it seemed irrationally attracted to Mr W, persisting in returning to him whenever it got bored of trying to fly into the ceiling fan. This was evidently quite annoying to Mr W. At least, I assume so, as he’d occasionally stop talking to growl at the fly. Anyway, at one point the fly went farther than it had tried to do before and flew right in front of him. Mr W pulled a sword out of his bag, hacked vainly in the fly’s direction, then calmly put it away and continued his lecture. He may have missed the fly, but he’d evidently taught it a lesson, as it didn’t go near him again.

Just today, Giuseppe joined my history class. Mr W was on top form. He pretended to be a Trappist monk, put on some music to make himself feel more like he was in a monastery, started telling us about John Stuart Mill, got distracted and recited three verses of Monty Python’s ‘Philosopher’s Drinking Song’ (and got the last line wrong, by the way. I’m kind of a big Monty Python person), told us who would be first against the wall when the revolution came, spoke some indecipherable German, and then bounced across the room. If I hadn’t known that Giuseppe had already had plenty of experience with his classes, I might have been concerned for her. As it is I think she’ll get by.



NB: This is a picture from 'Sanctum', a new film about caving (thus making it relevant to the heading), which Andrew Hansen is in. He wasn't actually in this scene. So I photoshopped him in.

AREA

As Senior Students, we are now located in the Senior School area. This is a good thing for some people. Marie-Clare, for instance. Ness. Brandine. Vyvyan.

For the rest of us, unfortunately, that means we now have our lockers in . . .

. . . THE CAVE

Which is, as you should be able to tell from the writing, not a good thing.

The Cave is part of the Year 11 locker area. I can’t tell you what the exact dimensions are, but it’s pretty small. It’s also u-shaped. I’m near the back in the middle of the U. Aviator is directly opposite me (hence why he found it so easy to figure out my locker combination), Mercedes is in one of the corners, and Lala is right at the back.

It’s hard to decide the worst part of the Cave. The way it gets hotter the further back you go would definitely be a contender. Or maybe the way people leave their lunch on top of their lockers and forget to take it off again, despite the fact that the top of the lockers are sloped and it’s theoretically impossible for anything to stay there. But if I had to pick the absolute most terrible thing about that area, then it would be the crowdedness.

It’s especially noticeable after school. Everyone’s crammed together, desperate to get to their bus on time, trying to put books in their bag without treading on the person below them, trying to move out while the people opposite them are nearly pressed against the and there are other people, trying to get out or get to their own lockers, and shoving in all directions . . .

Aviator has decided to remedy this by putting up signs saying ‘ONLY TRAVEL CLOCKWISE AROUND THIS AREA’, with helpful arrows for people who own digital watches. That’s the general gist of the sign, anyway. The actual one had a distinctly more Communist flavour to it. It said something like:

EVERYONE MUST MOVE CLOCKWISE AROUND THE CAVE

EVERYONE HERE IS EQUAL AND HAPPY

BUT IF PEOPLE DO NOT DO THIS, THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES

To be honest, it hasn’t proved that effective so far – although it’s fun going around anticlockwise just to annoy him – but there’s always time.



VENDING MACHINES

The vending machines are certainly an important change in our lives, maybe even above subjects. Whether a good one or a bad one, I’m not sure. I’ll let you decide.

I haven’t bought a single drink for myself yet out of the vending machines. Gwen bought me one when I gave her a pastry we made in Hospitality. Phoenix bought me one after I jinxed her (we both said ‘Who needs a visa, I’ve got a pink slip,’ at the same time. It’s a long, complicated, and pointless story). Regarding these two stories alone, the vending machines might seem like creations of good. Not so, though. They are also harbingers of evil.

Gwen has recently been getting annoyed at Eggleston and Falcon for drinking bottled water. They, however, claim that it tastes better. Some kind of deciding factor was needed. So we had a competition. We gave them each three bottles: one containing bottled water, one with tap, and one with filtered rain water that Gwen had taken out of her tank. Sadly, they both managed to get the bottled water right, although they screwed up over the tap/rainwater conundrum. I think it’s a combination of the school’s water system’s and the vending machine’s fault. The water system’s, because I’m sure regular water doesn’t taste as metallic as the stuff we got out of the bubbler. And the vending machine’s for working as a machine/fridge. We did try to warm the bottled water up in the hand dryers in the bathroom to make it closer to room temperature but it didn’t work. There was still a temperature difference.

Anyway, we now have to buy them drinks. It’s all right, though, as Gwen has her revenge planned. Sadly I can’t say what it is as we’re still in a crucial stage of planning. However, it’s going to be epic.

All of this isn’t even mentioning the Peanut Effect. Whenever Peanut – or Peanut’s money – go anywhere near one of said vending machines, things break. We don’t know why. All we know is that while any of us can purchase something from the machine and rely on it working, if somewhat erratically, it’s not the same for Peanut. I mean, yesterday Mercedes and I tried putting a 10-yen piece in the machine to see what would happen. It rolled out of one and got temporarily stuck in the other. Yet the next time we checked – today, I think – it was fixed. We can get away with this kind of thing, and yet if Peanut tried the same thing the machine would probably die. I believe that Phoenix is currently conducting a social study about this bizarre phenomenon, among others. Be assured that as soon as she delivers her thesis on the Peanut Effect to me I’ll publish it on my blog, as the surrogate website for the University of Uttoxetercamfordbridgedam.

Somebody else I had to buy a drink for recently (today) was Aviator. In hindsight, it was a bad move to bet him that he couldn’t find out my locker combination by the end of the week. Especially as he now knows my locker combination AND has achieved victory over me. Not an ideal scenario.



NB: This video is relevant because it has the word 'people' in it. I bet you didn't know Andrew Hansen was in a band called The Fantastic Leslie.

PEOPLE

Many people I know – formerly friends and colleagues – have undergone dramatic change during the migration from Year 10 to Senior School. Some haven’t changed at all. Gwen, for example, is still her anti-bottled-water environment-saving self. Aside from Peanut’s disastrous effects on vending machines, everything about her seems essentially the same. Giuseppe, too. Therefore I’ve restricted myself to discussing the people who seem most changed by this new environment.

Aviator has lost his braces and acquired glasses. He thinks they make him look like a Harvard professor. Ariane thinks he looks like Harry Potter. I think he looks like somebody’s grandmother. Who knows. Maybe the real answer is in some creepy combination of all three.

Seeing as Marie-Clare is now in the same area of the school as 25, I would have expected her to be slightly more excited. As is, she just seems vaguely embarrassed whenever I point him out to her. At first I was wondering if she really had undergone some major form of change, in which she doesn’t obsess over people she has never talked to, never even met, and who she has little to no chance of ever getting with.

That was until I remembered that she was just in love with Mark Zuckerberg. Compared to the 6.9-billion-dollar-man, all other romances probably seem trifling.

The greatest change I’ve noticed has been in Phoenix. Until recently – since Year 8, in fact – Phoenix has insisted in contacting us with emails and emails only, never speaking to us, hanging out with different people, and even going so far as to attend a different school. In a different country.

Now, however, she’s once again happy to speak to us and hang out with us. Yes, we have wrenched her safely out of the hands of the Americans. Luckily she still has her Australian accent as otherwise it might have been an impossible job.



NEW STUDENTS

(also known under their scientific name of ‘PEOPLE WHO HAVEN’T HEARD THE ELF JOKE YET’)

That’s another big change. Now, when I see unknown faces in my locker area, it doesn’t just mean that I’ve forgotten somebody in my year level. Sometimes it does – my memory is reserved for important things, like obscure British comedians and Andrew Hansen’s birthday, not people I see every day – but more commonly, it just means they’re new to the school.

What this also means is that I have a lot of new names to learn. There’s one boy who I’m convinced looks exactly like a Dylan, so much so that I told Vyvyan this was his name. It turns out that he’s actually called something entirely different, but I still think he looks enough like a Dylan to merit calling him that on my blog. Although it could theoretically get tricky not to confuse him with Bob Dylan. Still, I’ll work something out.

There are a number of new students in the Senior School, but one has been unluckier than most. Yes, one poor undefended student has joined our group. I bet she didn’t know what she was getting into.

I have dubbed her Mercedes, and she’s spent the last week and a half witnessing my friends (and me) at our best. Whether it’s Giuseppe, Aviator, and Bob Dylan wondering what they’d do if they met their doppelganger; Phoenix and I discussing our new plan of setting up a kindergarten especially for people who want their children to be wine tasters; me pretending I can speak semaphore; me claiming to have spent the weekend in the West Indies with a giant turtle; if I was in her position, I’m not sure I would have stuck around. However, she has, which is good because she’s nice and we like her and it’s good to have someone less mental around. Just in case.

BLOG-RELATED THREATS

As the end of the old year slides smoothly over to the beginning of the new one, I’m having to make some important life decisions. What university I want to go to (University of Sydney or bust). What career I want (I’m going to be a journalist). And whether I want to keep going with my blog.

Year 10 was, relatively speaking, fairly chilled. There was plenty of time to fit school work, netball, free time, and blog writing time into the week. But with Senior School I not only have about five times as much work to do, given the amount of extra commitment I’ve taken on, I have much less time to do it in. Frees help. But then again, I share a free line with Brandine, Vyvyan, and Spoon. Frees don’t really help.

So, do I really have time to keep a blog running?

On the one hand, I hate doing this. I hate the fact that I’ve stayed up until midnight typing, that I’ve now spent so long staring at the words I’m typing ‘hoswe’ instead of ‘how’ and ‘totwthe’ instead of ‘the’ and just not realising it until I go back and proofread. I hate that I’m doing this instead of doing one of my many assignments, when in reality this post is about four times as long as the assignment has to be and has taken just as much work.

On the other hand, however, I wouldn’t still be doing this if I didn’t like it. Don’t worry, I’m definitely keeping the blog up. I didn’t even want to be a journalist until I realised how much I enjoyed writing this. I just wanted to temporarily worry some of you (MARIE-CLARE. MARIE-CLARE) so, perhaps, you’d stop threatening me. It would be nice.

If I don’t put this post up by Monday, apparently, Marie-Clare is going to slap me. I’m tempted not to do it until then to see if she follows through. I’m worried she might, though. I mean, it’s unusual to have a realistic threat made. Normally Marie-Clare and Aviator just warn me that if I (a) don’t write or (b) write anything they don’t like they’ll burn my house down. That’s assuming that they wouldn’t actually burn my house down, of course – I wouldn’t put it past Aviator, but as he hasn’t actually done it yet, I’ll assume he’s relatively safe.

Sunday, January 16, 2011

An Oarful Dilemma

Recently - yesterday, in fact - Marie-Clare arrived at my house. The understanding was that we would watch an enormous number of films in the hours that were available to us. The films in question all had one thing in common: the presence of Jude Law, even though he died in most of them. Unfortunately, Marie-Clare and I have differing opinions on the matter of these films. It's the next day now, and we still haven't agreed over certain aspects of them. So, we formulated a new plan. Marie-Clare and I have each written what we thought of several of the films we watched, written below. It is up to you to judge who is right and who is wrong. Except bear in mind that this is my blog, and therefore I'm probably right.

GATTACA (1997)
Leslie
Anyone who reads this blog regularly is already aware exactly how unbelievably, unbeatably awesome I think the film 'Gattaca' is. I've seen it five times now and I hold the belief that it gets better every time. I think NASA even voted it to be the most realistic science fiction film of all time. It is dramatic, written from a believable premise, and intensely moving. Especially the end part, contrary to Marie-Clare's beliefs.

Marie-Clare
So, Leslie hyped it up a lot. It was like Avatar. Really hyped up, but then a big letdown. Well, it was better than Avatar, but you get what I mean. Jude Law's character, I must admit, was stunning. The other actors just couldn't live up to it. I did like the theme about it being set in the not-too-distant-future. Everyone knows I cry a lot in movies, but this one just didn't hit the spot. It wasn't moving. At all.

Leslie
Ok, I know I've already had my bit, but I'm not letting this go. ALL the characters and actors were fantastic. Also, I'm not taking this from someone who thought that two distinctly different characters - played by two distinctly different actors - were the same character, right up until they actually had a scene together. Also, what's not moving about DEATH?

THE TALENTED MR. RIPLEY (1999)
Marie-Clare
This film was not what I expected. Not for the squeamish, this film was disturbing from the beginning. There is a lot of death and unfortunately Jude Law dies quite early. Matt Damon is very good at portraying Mr. Ripley, and is also good at portraying Mr. Ripley portraying Mr. Greenleaf. I think it's much sadder in the end than Gattaca. Mind you, I still didn't cry.
The most disturbing part for me was not actually seeing anything but hearing the playback of a certain death scene. The other two hadn't affected me like that, despite the fake blood and Tom Ripley's freaky murder face.

Leslie
'The Talented Mr. Ripley' is about a man who kills people and steals someone's identity. I'm allowed to tell you that because it's not part of the plot that you're surprised to find out. It's a murder mystery without the mystery. And you were supposed to identify with the murderer.
I admit this film is probably not for people who don't enjoy seeing Matt Damon bludgeon his best friend to death with an oar. In fact, just about every character Mr. Ripley gets close to, he then goes on to either kill or attempt to kill. Part of what was so disturbing about this film was that I still don't know whether Tom Ripley was gay or not. You'd think I would have figured it out after a whole film, but no. I have genuinely no idea.

SHERLOCK HOLMES (2009)
Marie-Clare
This film I had already seen quite a few times, but it had a good plot line. I liked the fact that Jude Law didn't die in this film, which was a change. The only part that I didn't like as much was the fight scene in the boxing ring because that was quite disturbing. Although it was still less disturbing than 'The Talented Mr. Ripley'.
Again, I didn't cry in the end, although this one isn't really a sad movie. It was kind of murder mystery, kind of comedy. In my opinion, the film was witty, edgy, and action-packed. Well, that's what it says on the box.

Leslie
Despite the murders and graphic fight scenes of this film, I am forced to admit that it was way less graphic than Mr. Ripley. 'Sherlock Holmes' has a midget buried alive? Well, 'Mr. Ripley' has a man who attacks his best friend with an oar. And then steals his identity. I'm of the opinion that if Sherlock Holmes had been in 'Mr. Ripley', lives could have been saved. Although seeing that Jude Law is in both films, I'm not sure it would have worked. It would have been intensely confusing. Perhaps as confusing as the way Mr. Ripley KILLED everyone he liked, thus utterly destroying his own chances of happiness. I'm sorry, this isn't really a review of 'Sherlock Holmes'. But I'm still hung up over 'Mr. Ripley'.

And there are our opinions of the films. Although it should be noted that since writing about 'Mr Ripley', we Googled the ending and discovered that it actually made sense and that Mr. Ripley is not just a mad, psychopathic murderer. He is a psychopathic murder with a reason. Like a rebel with a cause. In fact, after learning of this ending Marie-Clare has stated that if she had realised it at the time, the movie may just have been sad enough to make her cry. Then again, Marie-Clare cried the time when we were watching Concert for George and Paul McCartney walked on the stage - which wasn't even a sad moment - and therefore her opinion is not as valid is it would otherwise be.

Marie-Clare has spent much of the non-film-watching time pestering me for a last name. The only other people in this blog who have achieved last names so far are myself, my family (who obviously have the same last name as me), and Giuseppe L. Schneider.
The problem, as I see it, is that Marie-Clare will be unable to decide her last name. When she raised the issue a couple of months ago, she wanted to have 25's last name, which I didn't give her, partly because (a) it's also the last name of a writer I like, although spelt differently, and I wouldn't do that to the writer in question, and (b) it was creepy. Now, after the benefit of some thought, she has decided she wants to go with Zuckerberg. This after viewing the Social Network and ALMOST crying. For those of you who aren't as centred on the Facebook CEO as Marie-Clare, here he is:


LESLIE (L): You can't have the last name of a real person.
MARIE-CLARE (MC): I'm not having the last name of a real person. Besides, I bet there are lots of people with the last name Schneider.
L: So what, Mark Zuckerberg isn't a real person?
MC: No. And Facebook is made up as well.
L: Then how can you explain the fact that I saw you going on Facebook yesterday?
MC: It was all in your imagination.

Marie-Clare has claimed that she 'deserves' a last name now as I have embarrassed her on the blog. Again. Also, she accuses me of having chosen a bad picture of Mark Zuckerberg. To which I say: I was writing that ALL down as we were saying it. It's completely accurate. Yes it is, Marie-Clare.

Marie-Clare and I were both on her supposedly non-existent Facebook page yesterday, chatting with an unsuspecting Facebook friend of hers. I was typing, Marie-Clare was talking, and overall I think we made a confusing impression upon her. Here is the conversation, almost in its entirety, although we have taken the liberty of removing certain information- as well as some people's names - that may give a clue as to her identity:

hey

hey

How are you this fine Canberran evening?

lol

well

just watching gossip girl?

you?

I wouldn't pollute my eyes with that rubbish, that trash, that foul garbage that passes for acceptable television. Apart from that, however, I am exceedingly well and perfectly fine.

lol

true

a guilty pleasure of mine

Are you experiencing feelings of excitement at the prospect of returning to our place of education?

HELL YES!

23 sleeps!!!

less than a moth

month*

I know. I, too, am overwhelmed with an influx of contradictory emotions. Excitement, worry, happiness, loss, guilt, euphoria, hunger . . . the list is endless.

lol

wow you use a lot of words

Well, one doesn't want to get out of practice when one intends upon doing not one, but two courses of English in the coming school year.

very true

I, personally, am currently listening to classical music while performing a ballet routine choreographed around the story of my life, writing a new and incisive biography of Oscar Wilde, and training a group of small, determined sea lions to sing in the key of A minor. While talking to you.

holy crap

you're amazing

Well, one doesn't like to boast of one's personal achievements, but I have recently been awarded both the Booker and Nobel prizes for my combined literary and scientific work, as well as being made Time magazine's person of the year. In fact, I'm rather hurt I received no congratulatory notice from you or your office.

oh wow

congrats!

i had no idea

Well, it's a little late, but my thanks to you all the same. It's a pity you didn't think to tell me before I decided to abandon my life in Australia in disgust at the lack of recognition I received, and attempt to seek my fortune in America.

wait

you're moving to america?

you are so kidding

and what are sea lions?

On the contrary, I have been living there for the past two weeks. I'm attempting to set up a joint venture with Mark Zuckerberg in order to destroy Bill Gates' grip on this and other nations. As for sea lions, they are the natural predators of sea monkeys, and I'm surprised you never covered it in Biology. My classmates and I covered the topic thoroughly during our time in Year 8.

yeah i know

but you're teaching them to sing?

you're just on a holiday in america

right?

NB: Marie-Clare has recently returned from a holiday in America, which is why we had the idea.

Yes, it's part of a project for the winter science fair at my American school. Sea lions are naturally prone to emitting a high-pitched keening noise - I believe it works to entice their prey, the sea monkeys. I am merely attempting to teach them to alter their pitch to such a degree that they have the ability to sing in harmony.

uh huh

You sound unconvinced.

well you never mentioned this

in our previous encounters

and you never used this kind of language either

plus this is over facebook

how do i know this is even you talking?

I am appalled at your lack of trust in the security of my Facebook page. I don't see why I should not be permitted to broaden my vocabulary - I consider it a useful skill in this modern world.

it's just

this conversation was totally out of the blue

and people's facebook's are easily hacked

and i know you have been or are in america

It's true that Facebook can be hacked, but why, if I were a hacker, would I be enticed into a long and intense conversation with somebody I didn't know? Furthermore, I have the ability to prove my identity, and I shall do so now.

ok ok

I'm sorry

I LOVE 25

lol

Would anyone other than Marie-Clare say that phrase?

and who before that?

who did you love before that?

One doesn't like to disclose a gentleman's name on a public forum, but as you insist: I believe the person you are referring to goes by the name of [insert name here].

yes he does

and you already disclosed 25's

25 is not a gentleman.

Hahaha

He is a sex god.

lol

k k i sincerely apologise

for doubting your identity

And I, dear friend, accept your apology humbly and sincerely.

and you have every right to expand your vocabulary when and as you please

Thank you understanding my pressing need for words; very few people are able to comprehend my addiction, as it is not, per se, of a physical kind, but I consider my word-love every bit as important as my love for 25.

lol

quite charming

Thank you. In fact, I think it all stems from my deep-set belief that I am the reincarnation of the late, great, prophetic man of words, Oscar Wilde.

Haha

that's cool

Yes, it's a fact I'm rather proud of. I aspire in every way to be like him; I spent my last holidays attempting to break into Reading Gaol.

Not, you understand, that Wilde was a man for burglary or felony of that nature, but he did spend a not inconsiderable period of time there and as such I wished to spend time in the same location.

ah i see

Have you ever had the feeling that you, too, may be a reincarnation of some great soul?

no i can't say i have

Ah. Alas, you are missing out on more than you could know.

Next time you see me - as I intend to visit Australia once more upon the commencement of your school year - you should raise the subject with me. I believe we could have a great deal to converse over.

well marie-clare you are quite something

sure thing

and what school will you be attending?

Thank you for your opinion on the matter; it's certainly high praise.

Whilst in America, I shall be attending the renowned institution of Taylorsville High, Salt Lake City.

i thought you said that salt lake is disgusting

anyway i must be off

bye

And yet I intend to make my home there. How quickly one's mind can change. You will already be aware of that fact, of course.

Looking at 25 and [insert name here] and my swift change between them.

yes

Well, if you must depart, I'll say farewell as well.

Ciao!


For now, I am not giving Marie-Clare her last name, until she thinks of something original that she will not change her mind about in two weeks. Although Marie-Clare does change her mind often, I think we can be fairly certain of one thing: she won't be going for Ripley. At least not any time soon.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Holiday Viewing

I've spent the past few days on the traditional post-Christmas family holiday. Usually in Sydney or at the coast, this year my family went all out and visited both locations.

New Year's Eve in Sydney means an evening of watching fireworks. Or, if you're one of those people whose parents let them stay out past midnight, a night of watching fireworks. Exciting stuff.
Sydney, for me, also means seeing my 17-year-old cousin Salamander. Salamander is one of those people who finds the concept of people living in Canberra absolutely hilarious. She can't understand why everyone doesn't live in Sydney, what with the plentiful buildings and beaches. I was hard pressed to think of something Canberra had that Sydney didn't.

LESLIE (L): We have an ice skating rink.
SALAMANDER (S): Yes. So do we.
L: How about museums?
S: We've got museums. AND beaches. You can't beat beaches. In Sydney you can beach it every day.
L: Beach it?
S: As in, go to the beach.
L: We don't need beaches. We have a lake.
S: Do you call up your friends and go 'Let's lake it for the day?' 'I'd like to lake it?'
L: No. Well. We have a war memorial.
S: 'Do you want to memorial it today?'
L: I've lost, haven't I?
S: Yes. Yes you have.

Superior as Sydney is, my family left on New Year's Day for the coast. We were rewarded with lovely pouring rain and plentiful mosquitoes. Not that mosquitoes bite me. I seem to be immune to them, but the RCG hates them. So much, in fact, that she is willing to practically drown herself in Aerogard as long as she's protected from their bites. This is all very well for her, but when there are five of you crammed into a medium-sized car, the scent of Aerogard pervading and suffocating, it's less pleasant. Just one of the many idiosyncrasies of the members of my family.

When forced to spend time with my family, I tend to hear fragments of bizarre conversations. Such as this one between the RCG and Drummer Boy:

RCG: If you could have a superpower, what would it be?
DRUMMER BOY (DB): I don't know. What would yours be?
RCG: I'd be able to fly. And be invisible.
DB: I think I'd like to be able to shoot bacon out of my ears.

Or, even more frequently, I tend to be involved in bizarre conversations. Such as this one on the subject of names. Drummer Boy, the RCG and me are all having our names changed soon. Nothing serious, just adding a middle name, but it did prompt this discussion (bearing in mind that Drummer Boy's full name is currently Drummer John Harper):

L: If we start here, where will it end? I might end up with seventeen middle names. Imagine the trouble filling in forms.
RCG: You wouldn't be able to remember all of them anyway.
DB: I'd like to change my name.
RCG: What to?
DB: Drummer Discus John Batman Batman Brooke Harper.
L: Two Batmans?
DB: How about three?
L: Two is fine.
RCG: Why discus?
DB: I like how it sounds.

That's Drummer Boy for you. He's basically the way I imagine Aviator must have been as an eleven-year-old. In fact, they get on surprisingly well. Aviator recorded a song. Drummer Boy remixed it. Aviator suggested, through me, that they form a musical comedy duo. Drummer Boy, through me, accepted. Considering the five year age gap, and the fact they've only met once, I think things are going well.

When you're at the coast, and it's raining, there's not much else you can do but watch films or read. I read a lot. By the time we went home I'd read all the books the RCG and I had brought, and was so desperate I resorted to reading recipe books.
Anyway, we watched a lot of films.

Some were terrible. One was a murder mystery set in a 13th-century monastery. I don't know how they did things back then, but I'm fairly sure the corpses aren't meant to BLINK while the hero, a former James Bond actor, is examining them. Some were cosmically significant. Those of you who have seen Inception will be aware that, moving aside from the general trippiness/awesomeness of said film, one of the key characters is an old man (the father), who dies. Said old man is played by an actor called Pete Postlethwaite. Well, my family are the kind of pedantic people who Google films right after watching them. And we discovered that Pete Postlethwaite had died an hour and a half previously - exactly when the character he played died in the film. Cosmic.

Some films may have been awful, but one was terrific. Anyone in my family - also Giuseppe, to whom I have expressed my new-found love for this film - will know the one I'm talking about. GATTACA. Awesome.


I found Gattaca on sale in the shops today, and bought it without a second thought. Why not? Jude Law is amazing, something I have failed to appreciate until now. He's the one on the far right in the picture. Jude Law's amazing amazingness is compounded by the fact that he stars in not one, but TWO films with Stephen Fry. One of which, unfortunately, isn't released until December 16th this year. Just a warning to everyone. I'm going to be impossible to talk to in the week before its release. Not quite up to Ariane-Lala-City of Glass standard. But close.

Anyway, this has been leading up to a conversation I had with the RCG on the subject of film. Japanese film in particular. She was criticising the names I'd given our two- and four-year-old half Japanese cousins. 'I mean, An? And Pan? What was that about?'
'I named them after their favourite show. You know, Anpanman?' (see picture to the right.
Anpanman is the hero of a Japanese children's anime. His head is made of bread. So far as I've been able to ascertain, this is his only superpower. Even being able to shoot bacon out of your ears would be more useful.)
'In Japanese, that means Breadman. You basically named Pan "Bread",' said the RCG.
'She won't care. She's two.'
'Yeah, but you could have named her after a different Japanese film or anime.'
'I don't know any other Japanese animes!' I pointed out.
'You must have watched some.'
'I haven't. I don't speak Japanese.'
'Well, I've watched some,' she said.
'You don't speak Japanese either.'
'I learn it at school!' she said indignantly.
'What have you learnt to say?'
'You know, basic things - like asking people's name, about their family, their pets . . .'
'And you're somehow able to watch entire animes in Japanese and know what they're saying?'
'Yes.'
'That's impossible,' I said triumphantly. 'You couldn't do a whole film.'
'Yes, I could.'
'Then how?'
'Because, Leslie,' she said wearily, 'I use subtitles.'